openspec: propose route-surface-breakdown
Surface + waytype proportion bars on route detail, from the BRouter waytags the Planner already computes (and currently discards on save). Design records the data-source decision: persist a compact distance-weighted breakdown for Planner-created routes (accurate, no external call); Overpass map-matching for imports/uploads is parked as a future option. Validates with `openspec validate --strict`. Specs only; no code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ce9b5f5ae8
commit
47f185598d
5 changed files with 185 additions and 0 deletions
73
openspec/changes/route-surface-breakdown/design.md
Normal file
73
openspec/changes/route-surface-breakdown/design.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
|
|||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
The Planner computes accurate per-coordinate surface/highway from BRouter's
|
||||
`messages`/`WayTags` (`apps/planner/.../route-merge.ts` → `EnrichedRoute`), and
|
||||
`ColoredRoute` already renders the route coloured by surface. But this metadata
|
||||
is **session-only**: the planner→journal handoff (`api.save-to-journal`) POSTs
|
||||
only `{ gpx }` to the Journal callback (`api.routes.$id.callback`), the `routes`
|
||||
table has no surface column, and GPX carries no surface extensions. So today no
|
||||
saved route has surface data.
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals / Non-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals**
|
||||
- Surface + waytype proportion bars on route detail, using data we already
|
||||
compute, with no new external dependency.
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Goals (v1)**
|
||||
- **Activities / imported / manually-uploaded GPX** — they have no waytags
|
||||
(bare GPX). They show no breakdown for now (see "Data source" → future
|
||||
Overpass).
|
||||
- **Colouring the Journal map line by surface** — needs per-segment data, not
|
||||
just the summary; a clean follow-up once the bars land.
|
||||
- Selectable surface-vs-waytype toggle UI beyond showing both bars.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### D1: Data source — persist BRouter waytags at save (Planner routes only)
|
||||
Two ways to get a breakdown onto the Journal detail page:
|
||||
|
||||
- **(A, chosen) BRouter-at-save** — the Planner already has 100%-accurate
|
||||
per-segment surface/highway; compute the distribution there at save and
|
||||
persist it. Accurate, cheap, no external call. **Limitation:** only
|
||||
Planner-created routes (activities/uploads have no waytags).
|
||||
- **(B, future) Overpass map-matching** — snap arbitrary route geometry to OSM
|
||||
ways and read `surface`/`highway` server-side. Covers imports/uploads, but
|
||||
it's expensive, approximate, rate-limited, and an external dependency. Parked
|
||||
for when we want imports covered (the repo already proxies Overpass for POIs).
|
||||
|
||||
v1 ships (A). Routes without the data degrade to no bars.
|
||||
|
||||
### D2: Store a compact distance-weighted summary, not per-segment data
|
||||
The bars need **proportions**, not geometry. At save, sum the haversine length
|
||||
of each coordinate segment into its surface bucket (and highway bucket),
|
||||
yielding `{ surface: { asphalt: <m>, gravel: <m>, … }, highway: { … } }`
|
||||
(metres per category). This is tiny (a handful of keys), stored as a nullable
|
||||
`surface_breakdown` jsonb on `routes`. Per-segment data (for future map line
|
||||
colouring) is deliberately *not* persisted in v1 — that's a bigger payload and
|
||||
a separate feature.
|
||||
|
||||
### D3: Handoff carries it
|
||||
`api.save-to-journal` adds `surfaceBreakdown` to the POST body alongside `gpx`;
|
||||
the Journal callback validates (Zod, all values ≥ 0) and stores it. The field
|
||||
is optional, so the handoff stays backward-compatible and non-Planner callers
|
||||
(if any) are unaffected. Re-saving a route recomputes/overwrites it.
|
||||
|
||||
### D4: Rendering
|
||||
A `SurfaceBreakdown` component renders one horizontal stacked bar per dimension
|
||||
(surface, then waytype): segments sized by percentage, coloured via
|
||||
`SURFACE_COLORS` / `HIGHWAY_COLORS` (`DEFAULT_*` for unknown), with a legend
|
||||
listing each category + km + percent (largest first). Unknown/unmapped tags
|
||||
collapse into an "other" segment. Hidden entirely when `surface_breakdown` is
|
||||
null or empty. Labels via i18n; distances via `stats.ts`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks / Trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Coverage gap** — only Planner routes get bars in v1. Acceptable: routes are
|
||||
*designed* in the Planner, which is exactly where "how much gravel" matters.
|
||||
Imports get bars later via (B).
|
||||
- **Tag sparsity** — OSM `surface` is often missing; those segments bucket as
|
||||
`unknown`/"other". We show it honestly rather than guessing.
|
||||
- **Stale on edit** — editing a route's geometry elsewhere without re-routing
|
||||
could leave the breakdown stale; recomputing on every Planner save keeps it
|
||||
fresh for the normal flow.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue