docs+openspec: prior-art research (Organic Maps, Endurain, wanderer) and 15 proposals
Add docs/inspirations.md as the durable record of the 2026-07-05/06 prior-art research — per-project learnings with source paths, canonical credit lines, and the changes each spawned — and extend the acknowledgment lists in philosophy.md/architecture.md (Organic Maps, Endurain, wanderer). New OpenSpec changes (proposal/design/specs/tasks each): - Organic Maps: elevation-profile-hardening, gpx-parser-robustness, hiking-time-estimate, poi-index, hiking-foot-profile - Endurain: account-export, activity-duplicate-review, fit-parsing-hardening, activity-locations, self-hosting-guide, activity-privacy-controls - wanderer: federation-hardening, link-share-tokens - credits-page (user-visible acknowledgments) Updated in-flight changes with wanderer prior-art sections: route-federation, route-discovery. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
be4f7e4ae8
commit
5dd4968626
80 changed files with 2600 additions and 2 deletions
55
openspec/changes/activity-duplicate-review/design.md
Normal file
55
openspec/changes/activity-duplicate-review/design.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Activity creation happens through several paths — Wahoo webhook/manual import, Komoot import, manual GPX upload, and soon Garmin backfill — all converging on the gpx-save layer. Per-provider dedup (`sync_imports` unique on provider + external id) prevents same-source re-imports; `import_batches` counts those. Nothing compares *across* sources. Activities carry `startedAt` (nullable — planned-route-style uploads may lack it) and `duration`. Feeds/stats/federation currently filter by `visibility` and `synthetic`.
|
||||
|
||||
Endurain's reference: exact same-start-time match → store with `is_hidden=true` + notification for manual review. We adopt the pattern but widen the match window (devices disagree by seconds) and tighten the quarantine semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
## Goals / Non-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals:**
|
||||
- The same physical activity arriving twice never double-counts in stats or appears twice to followers — without silently discarding data the user may want.
|
||||
- One detection point, one exclusion predicate — impossible for a new surface to forget the filter accidentally... (see risk).
|
||||
- Resolution is a two-tap user decision.
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Goals:**
|
||||
- Merging (picking best-of fields from both copies).
|
||||
- Geometry-similarity matching (same route ≠ same activity; time overlap is the honest signal).
|
||||
- Retroactive dedup of pre-existing rows (could be a later one-shot job).
|
||||
- Route dedup.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Heuristic: time overlap, not exact equality
|
||||
|
||||
Suspect when same owner AND both have `startedAt` AND |Δstart| ≤ 120 s AND (if both have durations) the intervals overlap ≥ 70%. Rationale: Garmin and Wahoo timestamps for one ride differ by GPS-fix seconds; exact equality (Endurain) misses those, while a bare ±2 min window without overlap check would false-positive back-to-back track repeats. Activities without `startedAt` are never suspected (nothing to compare).
|
||||
|
||||
*Alternative:* geometry proximity — rejected as both expensive and wrong (riding the same loop twice is two activities).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Quarantine = a self-referential FK, filtered everywhere via one predicate
|
||||
|
||||
`activities.suspected_duplicate_of_id` references the *earlier* activity. A shared query helper (e.g. `visibleActivities()` scope used by feed/listings/stats/outbox) gains `AND suspected_duplicate_of_id IS NULL`. The activity detail page remains reachable by the owner (that's the review surface); non-owners get 404 as if private. Federation: the Create is simply not emitted while quarantined; on "keep both", normal publish fires then.
|
||||
|
||||
*Alternative:* reuse `visibility='private'` + a reason column — rejected: it would destroy the user's chosen visibility (which must survive "keep both") and overload a user-facing concept with system state.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Resolution actions
|
||||
|
||||
Banner on the activity page (and notification deep-link): shows both copies' source (provider from `sync_imports`/upload), start time, duration, distance. **Keep both** → clear the FK; activity publishes with its original visibility (federation Create fires now). **Discard** → hard-delete the flagged copy (its `sync_imports` row remains, so the provider won't re-import it). The *original* activity is never touched.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Detection lives in the shared save path
|
||||
|
||||
The check runs inside the same transaction as activity insert for import-shaped creations (provider imports, uploads). Planner-saved activities don't exist (planner saves routes), so no exclusions needed. Import batches increment a new `suspectedDuplicateCount`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks / Trade-offs
|
||||
|
||||
- [A forgotten surface still shows quarantined rows] → The exclusion lives in the shared activity-listing helper; the task list includes an audit of every query site + a regression test that a quarantined activity is absent from feed, profile, stats, API list, and outbox.
|
||||
- [False positives annoy users (e.g. two people's devices on one account)] → Both copies survive; resolution is one tap; the window is deliberately tight.
|
||||
- [Race: two imports in parallel create both copies with neither flagged] → Detection query runs `FOR UPDATE` on the owner's recent-activity window inside the insert transaction; worst case (different processes) is caught by whichever commits second.
|
||||
- [Nullable startedAt uploads bypass detection] → Accepted; without a timestamp there is no honest signal, and manual uploads are user-intentional.
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Additive column + index (`owner_id, started_at` index already exists). Ship detection + exclusion + UI together. Rollback = revert; quarantined rows become visible again (harmless).
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- None blocking. A retroactive scan job for existing duplicates can be a follow-up once the review UI exists.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue