trails-cool/trails
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

docs: fix stale route-sharing → social-federation dependency

Browse source 
The roadmap claimed social-federation depends on route-sharing for
public routes, but that prerequisite shipped independently via
public-content-visibility (2026-04-24) and social-feed (2026-04-25):
visibility columns, public profiles, and IRI-keyed follows are all in
place. Reorder Phase 1 to reflect that federation can start now.

Also flag route-sharing's proposal as needing re-scoping: tasks
1.1-1.3 and 3.1 duplicate already-shipped visibility work, and the
proposed enum contradicts the shipped text-column design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ullrich Schäfer 2026-06-06 13:16:06 +02:00
parent f7002be0bd
commit 81ba2d5de3
2 changed files with 18 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
docs/roadmap.md
View file

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Five changes must ship before public announcement:
| Change | Why it blocks launch |
|---|---|
| [`route-sharing`](../openspec/changes/route-sharing/) | Visibility levels (private / public / shared-link) and forking. Federation depends on it. |
| [`route-sharing`](../openspec/changes/route-sharing/) | Per-user sharing (view/edit), forking, contributor tracking. (Visibility levels already shipped via `public-content-visibility`.) |
| [`social-federation`](../openspec/changes/social-federation/) | The platform is described as federated — launching without it would be misleading. ActivityPub, WebFinger, inbound Mastodon follows. |
| [`visual-redesign`](../openspec/changes/visual-redesign/) | Design system not yet implemented. Current UI is unstyled Tailwind. Must land before any public-facing announcement. |
| [`wahoo-production-cutover`](../openspec/changes/wahoo-production-cutover/) | Wahoo sandbox rate limits make the integration unusable at scale. Ops task, not a feature, but launch-blocking. |
@ -22,12 +22,16 @@ Five changes must ship before public announcement:
### Phase 1 — Feature complete
Implement all launch-blocking changes above, in dependency order:
Implement all launch-blocking changes above. There are no dependencies
between them — `social-federation`'s former dependency on `route-sharing`
was satisfied when `public-content-visibility` and `social-feed` shipped
(public routes/activities, public profiles, IRI-keyed follows). All four
can proceed independently:
1. `route-sharing` (no dependencies)
2. `social-federation` (depends on route-sharing for public routes)
1. `social-federation` (prerequisites already shipped)
2. `route-sharing`
3. `wahoo-production-cutover` (ops, can run in parallel)
4. `changelog` (no feature dependencies)
4. `changelog`
### Phase 2 — Polish sprint

9
openspec/changes/route-sharing/proposal.md
View file

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
> **⚠️ Needs re-scoping before implementation (noted 2026-06-06):** This
> proposal predates `public-content-visibility` (archived 2026-04-24), which
> already shipped route/activity visibility as a plain-text column with three
> values (`private | unlisted | public`), public detail pages, public profiles,
> and an owner-facing visibility selector. Tasks 1.1–1.3 and 3.1 are obsolete
> (and 1.1's enum approach contradicts the shipped text-column design — see
> `packages/db/src/schema/journal.ts`). The remaining scope — per-user sharing
> (view/edit), forking, contributor tracking — is still valid and unshipped.
## Why
Routes in the Journal are currently invisible to everyone except the owner. There