trails-cool/trails
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
trails/docs/reviews
History
Ullrich Schäfer 10a3a6f1c4
docs: archive the 2026-06-10 architecture + security review decks 
Both were sitting untracked in the repo root. They're the source for
the "candidate N from the 2026-06-10 review" references in this
batch of follow-up PRs, so keeping them in-repo makes those references
resolvable. Self-contained HTML; a short README indexes them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 08:33:48 +02:00
..
architecture-review-2026-06-10.html docs: archive the 2026-06-10 architecture + security review decks 2026-06-11 08:33:48 +02:00
README.md docs: archive the 2026-06-10 architecture + security review decks 2026-06-11 08:33:48 +02:00
security-review-2026-06-10.html docs: archive the 2026-06-10 architecture + security review decks 2026-06-11 08:33:48 +02:00

README.md

Reviews

Point-in-time review decks. Self-contained HTML — open directly in a browser (arrow keys / click to navigate). Each is a snapshot of its date; findings were triaged and tracked through PRs, so the deck reads as the "why" behind a batch of follow-up work rather than a live checklist.

  • architecture-review-2026-06-10.html — deepening opportunities (shallow modules, implicit interfaces, duplicated choreography). The 10 candidates were implemented across PRs that reference them as "candidate N from the 2026-06-10 review".

  • security-review-2026-06-10.html — defensive review of the auth, federation, secrets, and injection surfaces. Severity-calibrated (several scanner false-positives were verified and dropped). All actionable findings were fixed in follow-up PRs.