trails/docs/adr/0005-no-authmethod-polymorphism.md
Ullrich Schäfer 7e22f1260b
Add unify-auth-completion architecture artifacts
Extract the post-verify orchestration shared across passkey
register-finish, passkey login-finish, magic-link verify-code, and
magic-link click-through into a single completeAuth function. Two
ADRs record the decision:

- ADR-0004: centralize web auth completion (record terms + create
  session + redirect) in apps/journal/app/lib/auth/completion.ts.
- ADR-0005: explicitly no AuthMethod polymorphism. Passkey + magic-
  link is the entire identity surface; OAuth2/PKCE is session
  transport, not a peer method. Recorded as a negative decision so
  future architecture passes don't re-suggest extracting the
  interface.

CONTEXT.md gains an Authentication section covering completeAuth, the
two methods, the OAuth2-as-transport distinction, and where the Terms
gate enforcement lives (root loader for web, requireApiUser for API
per the just-merged mobile-terms-gate).

OpenSpec change unify-auth-completion captures the proposal, design
(5 decisions including the negative-scope choices), spec delta on
authentication-methods, and 14 tasks. Implementation follows on this
branch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-08 02:18:06 +02:00

40 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown

# No `AuthMethod` polymorphism — passkey + magic-link is the entire surface
A natural temptation when reshaping auth is to extract an
`AuthMethod` interface (analogous to the connected-services
`Importer` / `RoutePusher` / `WebhookReceiver` capability seams) so
passkey and magic-link become two adapters of a common shape, with
future Google/Apple/SAML/etc. as additional adapters. We are
explicitly **not** doing that, and recording the negative decision
here so future architecture passes don't re-suggest it.
Two reasons. First, the *number of adapters is fixed*: passkey is
trails.cool's preferred identity method and magic-link is its
fallback for browsers without WebAuthn support and cross-device sign-
in. There are no plans for additional methods. Social sign-in (Google,
Apple) would conflict with the privacy-first ethos in `CLAUDE.md`
(third-party identity providers see every login), would fight the
ActivityPub federation model (centralized OIDC vs.
`user@domain` identity), and would add account-linking edge cases
without a UX win — passkeys already deliver the one-tap convenience
that justifies social sign-in elsewhere. With two adapters and no
forecast third, an `AuthMethod` interface is theoretical
polymorphism with no future second customer; the deletion test fails.
Second, the *interface shape would be shallow*. WebAuthn is a
multi-step ceremony (start → finish, with challenge persistence
between calls); magic-link is a request-then-verify flow with a
15-minute token in the database. Forcing both into a unified
`startAuth(input) → finishAuth(response)` interface produces an
adapter where each implementation barely shares a type signature —
the two flows have genuinely different shapes, and the seam would
fill with optional methods and discriminated unions. The real
repetition lives in the *post-verify orchestration* (record terms,
mint session, redirect), which ADR-0004 addresses with a single
`completeAuth` function — no polymorphism required.
OAuth2/PKCE in the `mobile-app` change is sometimes mistaken for a
third auth method. It isn't: mobile users still authenticate via
passkey or magic-link in a WebView, and OAuth2 only exchanges the
resulting code for long-lived bearer tokens. OAuth2 is **session
transport** (peer of: HTTP-only cookie), not identity proof.