Add docs/inspirations.md as the durable record of the 2026-07-05/06 prior-art research — per-project learnings with source paths, canonical credit lines, and the changes each spawned — and extend the acknowledgment lists in philosophy.md/architecture.md (Organic Maps, Endurain, wanderer). New OpenSpec changes (proposal/design/specs/tasks each): - Organic Maps: elevation-profile-hardening, gpx-parser-robustness, hiking-time-estimate, poi-index, hiking-foot-profile - Endurain: account-export, activity-duplicate-review, fit-parsing-hardening, activity-locations, self-hosting-guide, activity-privacy-controls - wanderer: federation-hardening, link-share-tokens - credits-page (user-visible acknowledgments) Updated in-flight changes with wanderer prior-art sections: route-federation, route-discovery. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.5 KiB
Context
The repo's deployment story is flagship-shaped: infrastructure/docker-compose.yml assumes SOPS-encrypted env files, Caddy with production domains, the monitoring stack, and the two-host BRouter topology. docs/deployment.md and docs/server-hardening.md document that deployment. The env-variable surface of the two apps is discoverable only by reading apps/*/.env.example (journal) and code. Endurain's operator experience (three compose variants, exhaustive env table in docs/getting-started/advanced-started.md, Caddy/NPM recipes, secrets variant) is the reference.
The poi-index change (proposed) adds an optional data pipeline with an explicit self-hoster story ("works with empty POI table; regional extract configurable") — this guide is where that story gets told.
Goals / Non-Goals
Goals:
- A competent operator goes from
git cloneto a working instance (journal + planner + routing) in under an hour with only the guide. - The env contract is documented and CI-guaranteed not to rot.
- Flagship deployment remains untouched and separate.
Non-Goals:
- Kubernetes, Ansible, managed cloud recipes; automated backups; federation moderation/ops guides; one-click installers (Proxmox scripts etc. — community territory).
Decisions
1. A separate example compose, not a parametrized flagship compose
infrastructure/examples/docker-compose.selfhost.yml is written for operators: 4 services (journal, planner, postgres+postgis, brouter), one host, plain .env, named volumes, healthchecks, pinned image tags, no monitoring. Rationale: making the flagship compose serve both audiences couples every production change to operator UX; a small example file with a CI boot test is cheaper to keep honest than a matrix of overrides.
2. The env table is the contract
docs/self-hosting.md gets a single table: variable, required/optional, default, description — sourced by auditing apps/journal/.env.example, apps/planner env reads, and packages/db/jobs config. Writing it doubles as an audit: any variable whose default assumes flagship values (domains, vSwitch IPs) gets a sane default or a documented requirement. BRouter segment coverage (download-segments.sh region choice) is documented as the operator's first decision.
3. Secrets: plain .env primary, Docker secrets documented, no defaults ever
Small operators get .env (with a "chmod 600, not in git" note); the guide shows the Docker file-based-secrets variant for the two values that matter most (DB password, app secret keys) without shipping a third compose file. SOPS stays flagship-only.
Two rules adopted from the wanderer review (docs/inspirations.md — they ship real default keys in their committed compose, and we won't): the example compose and .env.example contain placeholders + generation commands only (openssl rand -hex 32), never working values; and the journal gains a boot-time hard failure when a required secret is missing or still a placeholder — refusing to start with a log line linking to the guide beats running silently insecure. (The boot check is a small app change carried by this change.)
3b. Backup guidance distinguishes real state from rebuildable state
The backup section names exactly what must be backed up (PostgreSQL dump + the media store) and what is deliberately excluded because it's rebuildable (BRouter segments — re-downloaded; the POI index — re-imported per poi-index; Prometheus/Loki data — observability history, operator's choice). wanderer documents the same rebuildable-cache principle for its search index. The restore procedure states the version rule explicitly: restore a dump into the same app version that produced it, then upgrade — schema migrations run forward on boot, not backward (wanderer's restore-only-within-minor-version caveat, made into guidance instead of a surprise).
4. CI smoke test keeps the example honest
A workflow job (PR-triggered on infrastructure/examples/**, docs/self-hosting.md, app Dockerfiles; plus weekly cron) boots the example compose with generated env, waits for health, asserts journal health endpoint + planner page + a BRouter route with the CI segment. Reuses the existing journal-image smoke-test pattern (#556).
5. BYO provider credentials
Connected services (Wahoo now; Garmin/COROS later) require per-instance developer apps. The guide documents: where to register, which redirect URI to configure (https://<domain>/api/sync/connect/<provider>), which env vars hold the credentials, and that HTTPS is required by providers. This also becomes the canonical answer for staging/preview questions.
Risks / Trade-offs
- [Example drifts from real app requirements] → the CI boot test is the mitigation; env-table drift is caught by the same audit test where feasible (fail if
.env.examplevariables are undocumented). - [Two compose files to maintain] → deliberate; the example is small and CI-covered.
- [Operators run without monitoring/backups] → backup section is prominent and prescriptive (nightly
pg_dump+ media volume copy); monitoring is explicitly optional with a pointer to the flagship stack as reference.
Migration Plan
Docs + example + CI only; no production impact. Rollback = revert.
Open Questions
- None blocking. Whether to publish prebuilt images to a public registry (operators currently build from source or reuse the CI images) is a distribution question to settle during implementation — the guide documents whichever is true at merge time.