trails/openspec/specs/authentication-methods/spec.md
Ullrich Schäfer 37073eafd7 Spec catchup: drift fixes, account-settings split, notifications archive
Drift (specs aligned to shipped code):
- social-follows: locked-account access rule for /users/:u/followers and
  /users/:u/following (owner + accepted-follower see; non-followers of
  private get 404). Adds the follow→notification lifecycle requirement.
  Fills the placeholder Purpose.
- public-profiles: counts degrade to plain text (not anchors) for viewers
  who can't see the lists. Cross-references social-follows. Fills the
  placeholder Purpose.
- journal-auth slimmed to cookie session + Terms gate. Auth methods moved
  out (see authentication-methods).

Splits:
- account-settings (14-line stub) deleted, content split into:
  - profile-settings (display name, bio, profile_visibility)
  - account-management (email change with verification, account deletion)
  - connected-services (Wahoo + future external integrations)
- authentication-methods split out of journal-auth: passkeys
  (register/login/add/delete), magic links, 6-digit codes
  (login + register), method toggle on register/login forms,
  dev-console fallback.

New specs:
- sse-broker: /api/events, in-process broker, useUnreadNotifications
  hook, Caddy passthrough, multi-process forward-compat contract.

Archived: notifications change → openspec/changes/archive/2026-04-26-notifications.
Promoted the four delta spec files into top-level specs:
- specs/notifications/ (new capability)
- specs/activity-feed/ (added: public activity fan-out)
- specs/journal-landing/ (added: Notifications navbar entry)
- specs/social-follows/ (added: follow→notification lifecycle)

Added openspec/CAPABILITIES.md grouped index covering all 40 specs with
a Conventions section explaining cross-references, naming, and the
catch-up-vs-change rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-26 02:02:43 +02:00

7.4 KiB

authentication-methods Specification

Purpose

The credentials a user can authenticate with on the Journal: passkeys (WebAuthn) and email magic links / 6-digit codes. Covers registration, login, adding a passkey to an existing account, and the UX toggle on the register/login forms that lets users pick the method that works in their browser. Session management, terms acceptance, and the cookie session cookie itself live in journal-auth — this spec only covers what proves identity.

Requirements

Requirement: Passkey-based registration

The Journal SHALL support WebAuthn passkey registration as the primary auth method when the browser advertises browserSupportsWebAuthn(). Registration SHALL create the user row, generate a credential, and start a session in one HTTP round-trip pair (step: "start" followed by step: "finish").

Scenario: Browser supports WebAuthn

  • WHEN a visitor completes the Register form with a browser that supports WebAuthn
  • THEN the form prompts for a passkey, the credential is stored in credentials, the users row is created with terms_version and terms_accepted_at, and a session cookie is issued

Scenario: Browser does not support WebAuthn

  • WHEN the browser reports browserSupportsWebAuthn() === false
  • THEN the Register form auto-switches to the magic-link/code path; the passkey button is not rendered

The Journal SHALL support a passwordless registration alternative: the user submits email + username, the server creates the account and a 15-minute magic token (with both a click-through link and a 6-digit code), and the user verifies through either path. Used in production over real email; in development the link/code is logged to the server console ([Register Magic Link] ...) so the dev can test without a mail transport.

  • WHEN a visitor submits the Register form with step: "register-magic-link" in production
  • THEN the server inserts the user row, creates a magic_tokens row with both token and code, sends the email (link + 6-digit code), and the form renders a "check your email" confirmation
  • WHEN the same flow runs with NODE_ENV !== "production"
  • THEN the server logs [Register Magic Link] <email>: <link> (code: <code>) to stdout instead of sending email, and the API response includes both devLink and code so the dev can paste either

Scenario: Verify via 6-digit code on registration

  • WHEN the new user enters the 6-digit code on the post-submit form
  • THEN POST /api/auth/login { step: "verify-code", email, code } validates against the same magic_tokens row (default purpose = "login"), marks it used, and starts a session — registration and first login share the verify-code endpoint
  • WHEN the user clicks the link delivered to their inbox (or to the dev console)
  • THEN /auth/verify?token=... validates the same row, marks it used, and starts a session

Requirement: Passkey login

The Journal SHALL support WebAuthn passkey login on /auth/login. The page SHALL default to the passkey method when browserSupportsWebAuthn() returns true; otherwise it SHALL pre-select the magic-link method.

Scenario: Passkey login on a browser with a registered credential

  • WHEN a returning user clicks "Sign in with passkey" on a browser that already holds the credential
  • THEN WebAuthn authentication completes, the matching credentials row is verified, and a session cookie is issued

Scenario: Passkey not found locally

  • WHEN the browser does not present any matching credential during the WebAuthn ceremony
  • THEN the login page surfaces the auth.passkeyNotFound error and the user can switch to the magic-link/code flow

The Journal SHALL support email-based login as the universal fallback. The login form SHALL include a "Use magic link instead" toggle (for users with WebAuthn but no local credential), which surfaces an email-only form; submitting it sends a magic link (production) or surfaces devLink + code (dev), and a 6-digit code form lets the user paste the code instead of clicking the link.

  • WHEN a registered user submits their email under step: "magic-link"
  • THEN a magic_tokens row is created with both token and code, and either the email is sent (prod) or devLink + code are returned (dev) plus [Magic Link] <email>: <link> (code: <code>) is logged to stdout

Scenario: Verify via 6-digit code

  • WHEN the user submits step: "verify-code" with the email and the 6-digit code
  • THEN the matching magic_tokens row is validated (not expired, not used), marked used, and a session cookie is issued
  • WHEN the login page detects browserSupportsWebAuthn() === false
  • THEN the page auto-selects magic-link mode and does not render the passkey button

Requirement: Method-toggle UX on register and login

The register form and the login form SHALL both render a small text toggle that lets the user manually switch between passkey and magic-link mode when both are available, mirroring the same UX on both surfaces.

Scenario: Toggle on register

  • WHEN a passkey-capable browser visits /auth/register
  • THEN the form starts in passkey mode and renders a "Use magic link instead" link below the submit button; clicking it switches the form to the magic-link path

Scenario: Toggle on login

  • WHEN a passkey-capable browser visits /auth/login
  • THEN the form starts in passkey mode and renders the same toggle to switch to magic-link mode

Requirement: Add passkey to an existing account

A signed-in user SHALL be able to add an additional passkey to their account from the settings page (or from the post-login /?add-passkey=1 prompt). The flow SHALL reuse the WebAuthn registration ceremony but bind the credential to the existing users.id rather than creating a new account.

Scenario: Add passkey from settings

  • WHEN a signed-in user clicks "Add passkey" in settings
  • THEN a WebAuthn registration ceremony runs against the existing user id and a new row is inserted in credentials linked to that user

Scenario: Post-login add-passkey nudge

  • WHEN a user has just verified via magic-link/code and lands on /?add-passkey=1
  • THEN the home page surfaces an "Add a passkey for faster sign-in" prompt; if dismissed it does not re-appear automatically

Requirement: Passkey deletion

A signed-in user SHALL be able to remove a passkey from their account via the settings page. The Journal SHALL prevent deletion of the user's last remaining passkey if no alternative auth method (a verified email for magic-link login) is available, to avoid lock-out.

Scenario: Delete one of multiple passkeys

  • WHEN a user with 2+ passkeys removes one via /api/settings/passkey/delete
  • THEN the matching credentials row is deleted; remaining passkeys stay valid

Scenario: Last-passkey safety net (verified email is the fallback)

  • WHEN a user attempts to delete their only remaining passkey
  • THEN the action proceeds because magic-link login by email is always available — passkey deletion does not lock the user out